Ambidextrous Intellectual Capital in the scientific research: An empirical analysis on university spin-offs

Nappo Fabio, Schimperna Federico, Schimperna Maria

This work aims at analyzing the level of awareness on the topic of planning and control by people with an apical role in research spin-offs, suggesting a framework to increase the survivability of spin-offs.

The universities take a strategic role as “knowledge incubators” to ensure competitive advantage through the use of their knowledge stock. In this scenario, research spin-offs contribute to the valorisation of intellectual capital in universities. However, Consorzio Netval’s data highlighted that the percentage of spin-offs liquidated from 2000 to 2019 is approximately 72%.

The analysis of the literature shows many issues that spin-offs face; however, there is little research on another possible critical issue that this study aims to fill: the difficulties during the phases of research spin-offs’ planning and control, especially in adequately balancing their short and long-term goals.

Thus, we submitted a questionnaire to a panel of experts to investigate their view of the management, planning and control systems. Results show a lack of attention to the application of these systems in spin-offs, while acknowledging awareness of their importance.

On the basis of these findings, we propose a framework to increase the survivability of research spin-offs, overcoming their main issues. Our framework relies on the application of ambidextrous intellectual capital to spin-offs, considered a valuable solution, given that it combines the attention to the future, typical of spin-offs and start-ups, with the attention to the present, necessary to go beyond the pre-seed phase.

Keywords: spin-off, intellectual capital, ambidexterity, innovation, planning and control; university

Appendice_Schimperna