Quale metodologia di ricerca sulle tematiche di Management Control?

Anteprima

Which research methodology on the Management Control issues?

The aim of the article is to discuss how to strenghthen the process of internationalization of research, but preserving the basic values of Italian accounting thought, also in the methodological side, i.e. maintaining the integrated inductive-deductive method of research.Specific reflections are carried out on the more and more relevant role played by the analytical demonstrations of the research hypotheses, with an experimental approach typical of the “hard” sciences. In particular, the research hypotheses are often based on cause-effect relationships in a true-false logic, with reference to the available data bases or to data collected on a sample basis, often neglecting the accuracy of such a data. Even the language used is more and more the mathematical one, not suitable for the scientific communication in our community, because it neglects the qualitative variables, the interpretation of the data and the understanding of the multiple non-linear cause-effect relationships.With regard to the contents, the relevant issues seem to be no more those related to the understanding of the business complexity, but those that may lent best to the correlation analysis; in fact, the focus is on the quantitative methods, considered a priori better, and this increasingly determines the detachment from the business reality.

Keywords: research methodology, quantitative methods, qualitative methods, data accuracy.

Bibliografia
  1. Baldvinsdottir G., Mitchell F., Nørreklit H.  (2010), Issues in the relationship between theory and practice in management accounting, Management Accounting Research, 21, pp. 79–82.
  2. Cinquini L., Miraglia R.A., Giannetti R. (2016), Editoriale. Strumenti di gestione dei costi e misure di performance negli attuali contesti competitivi, Management Control, 2, pp. 5-14. Doi: 10.3280/MACO2016-002001.
  3. Elbashir, M.Z., Measuring the effects of business intelligence systems: The relationship between business process and organizational performance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 2008, vol. 9, n. 3, pp. 135–153.
  4. Greco G. (2014), Una comparazione internazionale tra i sistemi di valutazione della ricerca scientifica, Management Control, 1, pp. 87-99. Doi: 10.3280/MACO2014-001006.
  5. Mancini D. (2016), Accounting Information Systems in an Open Society. Emerging Trends and Issues, Management Control, 1, pp. 5-16. Doi: 10.3280/MACO2016-001001.
  6. Marchi L. (2015), Nuove prospettive di ricerca sulle tematiche di Management Control, Management Control, 3, pp. 5-8. Doi: 10.3280/MACO2015-003001.
  7. Marchi L., Marasca S., Giuliani M. (2013), Valutare la ricerca nella prospettiva europea e internazionale: prime riflessioni, Management Control, 3, pp. 99-113. Doi: 10.3280/MACO2013-003006.
  8. Paolini A., Quagli A. (2013), Una riflessione sugli strumenti bibliometrici per la valutazione della ricerca e una proposta: il real impact factor, Management Control, 3, pp. 115-128. Doi: 10.3280/MACO2013-003007.
  9. Rusconi G. (2014), La valutazione della ricerca scientifica. Alcuni spunti di riflessione dopo le recenti esperienze in Italia, Management Control, 1, pp. 73-85. Doi: 10.3280/MACO2014-001005.
  10. Ryan B., Scapens R. W., Theobald M. (2002), Research Method & Methodology in Finance & Accounting, 2nd edition, Thomson.
  11. Young D.W. (2013), The Managerial Implications of Caritas in Veritate, Management Control, 1, pp. 7-25. Doi: 10.3280/MACO2013-001002.