L’adozione del “Ciclo di Gestione della Performance” nelle istituzioni scolastiche pubbliche italiane: un’analisi empirica

Anteprima

Performance Management in the Italian public schools: an empirical analysis

School autonomy and evaluation issues, promoted by the recent reform processes, increased the interest of public schools in the accountability purposes aimed at making them accountable for greater decision making powers they received. These changes, affecting both their performance approaches, typically centered on students’ learning and achievement measures, referable to School Effectiveness and Improvement studies, and the related School Accountability (SA) processes, are driving public schools towards the performance measurement, management and accountability perspectives applied in the other public organizations. In this framework, in Italy, the D.Lgs. 150/2009 (as modified by the D.Lgs. 74/2017) represents another relevant driver since it imposes public organizations, including public schools, the adoption of the “Performance Management Cycle” (PMC). This cycle provides, to assure a complete accountability about performance, the publication of the “Performance Plan” (PP) and the “Performance Report” (PR).

The study presents an exploratory analysis, referred to the years 2011-2016, about the adoption and the compliance level of PPs and PRs produced by a sample of 2,000 public schools with the requests of the D.Lgs. 150/2009 and the related CIVIT Resolutions.

Results show a modest level of adoption of the PMC (5.6% of the sample) and very low compliance levels of the contents included in the PPs and in the PRs.

Keywords: Performance Management, Italian Public Schools Accountability, Performance Plan, Performance Report

5_MC19_02_RAUCCI Figure

5_MC19_02_RAUCCI Tabelle

Bibliografia
  1. Allini A., Caldarelli A., Spanò R. (2017), La disclosure nei Piani della Performance delle università italiane. Intenti simbolici verso approcci sostanziali di legittimazione, Management Control, 1, pp. 37-59. Doi:10.3280/MACO2017-001003.
  2. Allini A., Caldarelli A., Spanò R., Zampella A. (2019), Legitimating efforts in Performance Plans. Evidences on the thoroughness of disclosure in the Italian Higher Education setting, Management Control, 1, pp. 143-168. Doi: 10.3280/MACO2019-001007.
  3. Anderson K.J. (2012), Science education and test‐based accountability: Reviewing their relationship and exploring implications for future policy, Science Education, 96, 1, pp. 104-129.
  4. Angerilli M.A., Giusepponi K., Ricci G. (2011), Dirigere una scuola, Maggioli Editore.
  5. Anselmi L. (1995), Il processo di trasformazione della pubblica amministrazione, Torino, Giappichelli.
  6. Aversano N., Manes Rossi F., Polcini Tartaglia P. (2017), I sistemi di misurazione della performance nelle università: considerazioni critiche sul sistema italiano, Management Control, 1, pp. 16-36. Doi:10.3280/MACO2017-001002.
  7. Bae S. (2018), Redesigning systems of school accountability: A multiple measures approach to accountability and support, Education policy analysis archives, 26, 8, pp. 1-32.
  8. Bonollo E., Zuccardi Merli M. (2016), Le Relazioni sulla performance nelle aziende della sanita pubblica: verso una maggiore trasparenza dei risultati raggiunti. Un’analisi empirica, Mecosan, 99, pp. 43-73.
  9. Borgonovi E., Anessi-Pessina E., Bianchi C. (Editors) (2018), Outcome-based performance management in the public sector, Springer.
  10. Bouckaert G., Halligan J. (2008), Managing performance. International comparisons, New York: Routledge.
  11. Bovens M. (2010), Two Concepts of Accountability: Accountability as a Virtue and as a Mechanism. West European Politics, 33, 5, pp. 946-967.
  12. Bowen G.A. (2009), Documentary Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method, Qualitative Research Journal, 9, 2, pp. 27-40.
  13. Bracci E. (2006), La scuola dell’autonomia: analisi di contesto e implicazioni gestionali, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  14. Bracci E. (2009), Autonomy, responsibility and accountability in the Italian school system, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20, pp. 293-312. 
  15. Brown A. (2005), Implementing performance management in England’s primary schools, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54, 5/6, pp. 468-481.
  16. Chapman C., Muijs D., Reynolds D., Sammons P., Teddlie C. (Eds.) (2015), The Routledge international handbook of educational effectiveness and improvement: Research, policy, and practice. Routledge.
  17. Christensen T., Lægreid P. (2015), Performance and accountability – A theoretical discussion and an empirical assessment, Public Organization Review, 15, 2, pp. 207-225.
  18. Coy D., Pratt M. (2001), Public Accountability: a new paradigm for college and university annual reports, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12, 1, pp. 1-31.
  19. Dal Molin M., Turri M., Agasisti T. (2017), New Public Management Reforms in the Italian Universities: Managerial Tools, Accountability Mechanisms or Simply Compliance?, International Journal of Public Administration, 40, 3, pp. 256-269.
  20. Deidda Gagliardo E., Bigoni M. (2012), Il Piano della Performance nei comuni medi. La proposta di una nuova configurazione per superare l’inadeguatezza delle prima applicazioni, RIREA, 5/6, pp. 228-242.
  21. Deidda Gagliardo E., Bigoni M., Papi L., Gobbo G. (2019), La programmazione dei Ministeri nella nuova stagione della performance. Dalla burocrazia della performance alla performance utile, Management Control, 1, pp. 169-189. Doi: 10.3280/MACO2019-001008.
  22. Del Bene L. (2014), L’applicazione del D.Lgs.150/2009 negli enti locali tra opportunità e rischi. L’esperienza del Comune di Livorno, Azienda Pubblica, 1, pp. 39-56.
  23. Elmore R.F. (2004), School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance, Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
  24. Figlio D., Loeb S. (2011), School Accountability, in Hanushek E.A., Machin S.J., Wöbann L. (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Education, Amsterdam, Elsevier.
  25. Fitzgerald T., Youngs H., Grootenboer P. (2003), Bureaucratic control or professional autonomy?: Performance management in New Zealand schools, School Leadership & Management, 23, 1, pp. 91-105.
  26. Franzoni S., Gennari F. (2013), School Networks and Sustainable Development, Symphonya, Emerging Issues Management, 2, pp. 32-46.
  27. Halachmi A. (2005), Performance measurement is only one way of managing performance, International journal of productivity and performance management, 54, 7, pp. 502-516.
  28. Hamilton L.S., Schwartz H.L., Stecher B.M., Steele J.L. (2013), Improving accountability through expanded measures of performance, Journal of Educational Administration, 51, 4, pp. 453-475.
  29. Harrison J., Rouse P., de Villiers C. (2012), Accountability and performance measurement: a stakeholder perspective, Journal of Centrum Cathedra: The Business and Economics Research Journal, 5, 2, pp. 243-258.
  30. INVALSI (2016), Mappa indicatori per Rapporto di Autovalutazione,  http://www.istruzione.it/snv/allegati/2017/Mappa_degli_indicatori.pdf
  31. Jacobsen R., Saultz A. (2016), Will Performance Management Restore Citizens’ Faith in Public Education?. Public Performance & Management Review, 39, 2, pp. 476-497
  32. Kim J. (2018), School accountability and standard-based education reform: The recall of social efficiency movement and scientific management, International Journal of Educational Development, 60, pp. 80-87.
  33. Krippendorff K. (2004), Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology, London, SAGE.
  34. Marchi L. (2015), Editoriale. Nuove prospettive di ricerca sulle tematiche di Management Control, Management Control, 3, pp. 5-8.
  35. Martini A. (2014), La pubblicità dei risultati della valutazione esterna dei livelli di apprendimento raggiunti dalle scuole: pro e contro, alla luce delle esperienze internazionali, FGA Working Paper n.52, Fondazione Agnelli.
  36. Matacena A., Bencivenga V., Boselli, I. (2006), Accreditamento e valutazione: verso una nuova sintesi?, in Paletta A., Vidoni D., a cura di, Scuola e creazione di valore pubblico. Problemi di governance, accountability e management, Roma: Armando.
  37. Meier K., Andersen S.C., O’Toole L.J., Favero N., Winter S.C. (2015), Taking managerial context seriously: Public management and performance in US and Denmark schools, International Public Management Journal, 18, 1, pp. 130-150.
  38. Minelli  E., Rebora  G., Turri  M. (2008), How can evaluation fail? The case of Italian universities, Quality in higher education, 14, 2, pp. 157-173.
  39. Møller J. (2009), School leadership in an age of accountability: Tensions between managerial and professional accountability, Journal of Educational Change, 10, 1, pp. 37-46.
  40. Mori E. (2014), La trasparenza delle istituzioni scolastiche attraverso l’uso del web, Azienda Pubblica, 4, pp. 315-346.
  41. Mussari R., D’Alessio L., Sostero U. (2015), Brevi considerazioni sui mutamenti in atto nei sistemi di contabilità finanziaria, Azienda Pubblica, 3, pp. 227-246.
  42. Ng P.T. (2010), The evolution and nature of school accountability in the Singapore education system, Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 22, 4, pp. 275-292.
  43. Nisio A., De Carolis R., Losurdo S. (2012), Il ciclo della performance negli Enti Locali: un’analisi empirica sull’adozione del piano della performance, Management Control, 2, pp. 13-31.
  44. Nisio A., De Carolis R., Losurdo S. (2018), Introducing performance management in universities: the case of a university in Southern Italy, International Journal of Management in Education, 12, 2, pp. 132-153.
  45. Nitzl C., Sicilia M., Steccolini I. (2019), Exploring the links between different performance information uses, NPM cultural orientation, and organizational performance in the public sector, Public Management Review, 21, 5, pp. 686-710.
  46. Normore A.H. (2004), The edge of chaos: School administrators and accountability, Journal of Educational Administration, 42, 1, pp. 55-77.
  47. Ongaro E., Valotti G. (2008), Public management reform in Italy: explaining the implementation gap, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21, 2, pp. 174-204.
  48. Paletta A. (2006), La misurazione della performance per la gestione strategica delle istituzioni educative, in Paletta A., Vidoni D. a cura di, Scuola e creazione di valore pubblico. Problemi di governance, accountability e management, Roma, Armando.
  49. Paletta A. (2011), Scuole responsabili dei risultati: accountability e bilancio sociale, Bologna, Il Mulino.
  50. Paletta A., Tieghi M. a cura di (2007), Il bilancio sociale su base territoriale: dalla comunicazione istituzionale alla public governance, Torino, Isedi.
  51. Paletta A. (2012), Public governance and school performance, Public management review, 14, 8, pp. 1125-1151.
  52. Paolini A., Soverchia M. (2015), La programmazione delle università italiane si rinnova: riflessioni e primi riscontri empirici, Azienda Pubblica, 3, pp. 287-308.
  53. Paolini A., Soverchia M. (2017), I sistemi informativi per il controllo e la valutazione delle performance nelle università italiane, Management Control, 1, 1, pp. 5-14. Doi: 10.3280/MACO2017-001001.
  54. Pattaro A.F., Mori E. (2012), La misurazione e la valutazione della performance nella dirigenza scolastica. Alcune esperienze internazionali a confronto, Azienda Pubblica, 3, pp. 301-328
  55. Pavan A., Reginato E. (2012), Programmazione e controllo nelle amministrazioni pubbliche. Gestione per obiettivi e contabilità integrata. Giuffrè Editore.
  56. Ploom K., Haldma T. (2013), Balanced performance management in the public education system: An empirical study of Estonian general education schools, Baltic Journal of Management, 8, 2, pp. 183-207.
  57. Poddighe F., Deidda Gagliardo E., Bigoni M. (2013), Il Piano della Performance 2011-2013 dei Comuni italiani di medie e grandi dimensioni: allineamento normativo e adeguatezza programmatica in ottica economico-aziendale, Azienda Pubblica, 4, pp. 451-475.
  58. Powell W.W, DiMaggio P.J., Eds. (2012), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, University of Chicago Press.
  59. Preite D. (2011), Misurare la performance nelle amministrazioni pubbliche: Logiche, metodi, strumenti ed esperienze, Milano, Egea.
  60. Raucci D., Agostinone S. (2018), La rendicontazione sociale come strumento di public school accountability. Un’analisi empirica del contesto scolastico italiano, in Corbella S., Marchi L., Rossignoli C. a cura di, Nuove frontiere del reporting aziendale, FrancoAngeli, pp. 209-242.
  61. Rea M.A., La Torre M. (2014), Il Ciclo di gestione della performance nelle Camere di Commercio: approcci e livelli di compliance, RIREA, 3/4, pp. 161-176.
  62. Ricci P. (2016), Accountability, In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, Springer International Publishing, pp. 1-6.
  63. Sahlberg P. (2010), Rethinking accountability in a knowledge society, Journal of Educational Change, 11, pp. 45-61.
  64. Salvioni D.M., Cassano R. (2017), School Governance, Accountability and Performance Management, International Journal of Financial Research, 8, 2, pp. 176-181.
  65. Sargiacomo M. a cura di (2015), Public Sector Management in Italy, UK, McGraw-Hill Education.
  66. Sarrico C.S., Rosa M.J., Manatos M.J. (2012), School performance management practices and school achievement, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61, 3, pp. 272-289.
  67. Sirotnik K.A. (Editor) (2005), Holding accountability accountable. What ought to matter in public education, New York, Teachers College Press.
  68. Smith M., Taffler R.J. (2000), The chairman’s statement-A content analysis of discretionary narrative disclosures, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13, 5, pp. 624-647.
  69. Steccolini I. (2003), L’accountability delle pubbliche amministrazioni, in Pezzani F., a cura di, L’accountability delle Amministrazioni Pubbliche, Milano, Egea, pp. 17-32.
  70. Storey A. (2002), Performance management in schools: Could the balanced scorecard help?, School Leadership & Management, 22, 3, pp. 321-338.
  71. Van Dooren W., Bouckaert G., Halligan J. (2015), Performance management in the public sector, Routledge.