A Roadmap for Performance Measurement in Smarter Universities

Anteprima

The university modernization process has introduced a new concept of such institutions: the “Smarter University”. According to this concept, the new role of universities in modern society consists not only of cooperation with other actors focusing on social, cultural and economic activities but also the wide use of web-based technologies to support traditional teaching and research, as well as engagement and social interaction (Coccoli et al., 2014).

The Smarter University model is the result of technological innovations and, in particular, digital tools that facilitate interconnection, networking and sharing between individuals and groups (Coccoli et al., 2014) and increase the ability of universities to contribute to economic and social development.

The new concept of the university has attracted research attention aimed at finding appropriate models to measure the performance of such institutions. In this paper, we develop a model to measure the contribution of smarter universities to social, economic and cultural development. We adopt an integrated approach that links performance measurement to the smart university’s mission and its new business model.

Keywords: Smart Organizations, Smart Universities, Performance Measurement, Triple Helix, SMART Performance Pyramid.

Bibliografia
  1. Afonso Ó., Monteiro S., Thompson M. J. R. (2010), A growth model for the Quadruple Helix innovation theory, NIPE Working Paper 12, Braga, Universidade do Minho.
  2. Al-Kasasbeh M.M., Al-Kasasbeh S.A.M., Al-Faouri A.H. (2016), Smart Organization Characteristics and its Impact on Social and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Study on Jordan Phosphate Mines Company, International Journal of Business and Management, 11, 8, pp. 106-115.
  3. Al-Qasim A.G.M. (2010), Organizational Smartness of the Commercial Banks Working in  Jordan, Administrative Sciences, 37, 2, pp. 365-387.
  4. Albino V., Berardi U., Dangelico R.M. (2015), Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, perfomance, and initiatives, Journal of Urban Technology, 22, 1, pp. 3-21. Doi: 10.1080/10630732.2014.942092.
  5. Birnbirg J. (1998), Control in interfirm co-operative relationships, Journal of Management Studies, 35, 4, pp. 421–428. Doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00102.
  6. Bizer C, Heath T, Berners-Lee T (2009), Linked data – the story so far. Issue on Linked Data, International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 5, 3, pp. 1-22.
  7. Bonollo E., Lazzini S., Zuccardi Merli M. (2015), Innovations in accounting information system in the public sector. Evidences from Italian public universities, in Mancini D., Dameri P., Bonollo E. Strengthening Information and Control Systems, Springer book, 14, pp. 199–216.
  8. Bueno-Delgado M. V., Pavón-Marino P., De-Gea-Garcia A., Dolon-Garcia A. (2012), The  smart university experience: An NFC-based ubiquitous environment, paper read at Sixth International Conference of Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing (IMIS), pp. 799-804.
  9. Cantele S., Martini M., Campedelli B. (2012), Gli atenei italiani e gli strumenti di pianifiaczione e controllo: a che punto siamo?, Management Control, 1, pp. 55-83. Doi: 10.3280/MACO2012-001004.
  10. Caporarello L., Di Martino B., Martinez M. (2013), Composing and Orchestrating the Smart Artifacts: Technological and Organizational Challenges, in Caporarello L., Di Martino B., Martinez M. Smart Organizations and Smart Artifacts Fostering Interaction Between People, Technologies and Processes, Springer Book, 7, pp. 1-8.
  11. Castellano N. (2012), La misurazione delle performance per le piccole imprese. Strumenti di misurazione e processi di controllo, Torino, Giappichelli.
  12. Coccoli M., Guercio A., Maresca P., Stanganelli, L. (2014), Smarter universities: A vision for the fast changing digital era, Journal of Visual Language and Computing, 25, 6, pp. 1003 1011.
  13. Donoghue S., Kennerley M. (2008), Our Journey Towards World Class Leading Transformational Strategic Change, paper presented at the OECD/IMHE General Conference, Paris, 8-10 September.
  14. Eckerson W. (2003), Smart Companies in the 21st Century: The Secrets of Creating Successful Business Intelligence Solutions, retrieved from http://download.101com.com/tdwi/research_report/2003BIReport_v7.pdf.
  15. Etzkowitz H. (2008), The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action, London, Routledge.
  16. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. (1995), The Triple Helix: University – Industry – Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge-Based Economic Development, EASST Review, 14, pp. 14–19.
  17. Etzkowitz H., Webster A., Gebhart C., Terra, B.R.C. (2000), The future of the university and the university of future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm, Research Policy, 130, pp. 313-330.
  18. Europe (2020), A European strategy for smart, sustainable & inclusive growth, Retrived from http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20%20007%0-%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdf.
  19. European Commission (2013), Improving the quality of teaching and learning in Europe’s higher education institutions, retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/repository/education/library/reports/
  20. European University Association (2014), Annual report, retrived from http://eua.be/Libraries/publications-homepagelist/EUA Annual Report 2014.pdf?sfvrsn=8.
  21. Fandel G. (2007), On the performance of universities in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany: Government’s redistribution of funds judged using DEA efficiency measures, European Journal of Operational Research, 176, 1, pp. 521-533. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.06.043.
  22. Filos E. (2006), Smart organizations in the digital age, in Mezgár I. Integration of Information and Communication Technologies in Smart Organizations, Idea Group, Hershey, pp. 1-38.
  23. Florida R. (2003), Cities and the creative class, City & Community, 2, 1, pp. 3-19.
  24. Gillett E, Lehr H, Osorio C (2004), Local government broadband initiatives, Telecommunication Policy, 28, 7, pp. 537–558.
  25. Giovanelli L., Rotondo F., Caffù S. (2016), Implementing Accrual Accounting in Italian Universities: Critical Aspects of an Information System, in Mancini D., Dameri P., Bonollo E. Strengthening Information and Control Systems, Springer Book, 13, pp. 185–198.
  26. Giuliani M., Marasca S. (2015), La valutazione della ricerca tramite indici bibliometrici: riflessioni da una prospettiva economico-aziendale, Management Control, 1, pp. 133-151. Doi: 10.3280/MACO2015-001006.
  27. Greco G. (2014), Una comparazione internazionale tra i sistemi di valutazione della ricerca scientifica, Management Control, 1, pp. 87-99. Doi: 10.3280/MACO2014-001006.
  28. Harrison, C., Eckman, B., Hamilton, R., Hartswick, P., Kalagnanam, J., Paraszczak, J., Wiliams, P. (2010), Foundations for Smarter Cities, IBM Journal of Research and Development, 54, 4. Doi: 10.1147/JRD.2010.2048257.
  29. Hollands R. (2008), Will the real smart city please stand up?, City, 12, 3, pp. 303-320.
  30. Huggins R., Johnston, A. (2009), The economic and innovation contribution of universities: a regional perspective The Economic and Innovation Contribution of Universities : A Regional Perspective, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27, 6, pp. 1088–1106. Doi: 10.1068/c08125b.
  31. Johnes J. (2006), Measuring teaching efficiency in higher education: An application of data envelopment analysis to economics graduates from UK Universities 1993, European Journal of Operational Research, 174, 1, pp. 443-456. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.02.044.
  32. Kaplan R.S., Norton D. (1992), The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance, Harvard Business Review, 70, 1, pp. 71–79.
  33. Kolehmainen J., Irvine J., Stewart L., Karacsonyi Z., Szabó T., Alarinta J., Norberg, A. (2016), Quadruple Helix, Innovation and the Knowledge-Based Development: Lessons from Remote, Rural and Less-Favoured Regions, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7, 1, pp. 23-42. Doi: 10.1007/s13132-015-0289-9.
  34. Kulatunga U., Amaratunga D., Haigh R. (2007), Performance measurement in the construction research and development, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56, 8, pp. 673-88.
  35. Lamboglia R., Mancini D., Piedepalumbo P. (2016), New Business Model for Value Co-creation in Smarter Universities, in Marchi L., Lombardi R., a cura di, Il governo aziendale tra tradizione e innovazione, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  36. Lawrence, S., Sharma, U. (2002). Commodification of education and academic labour—using the balanced scorecard in a university setting, Critical perspectives on accounting, 13, 5 6, pp. 661-677. Doi: 10.1006/cpac.2002.0562.
  37. Levine R., Locke C., Searls D., Weinberger D. (2000), The Cluetrain Manifesto. The End of Business as Usual, Cambridge, Perseus.
  38. Lynch R.L., Cross, K.F. (1988). The “SMART” Way to Define and Sustain Success, National Productivity Review, 8, 1, pp. 23-33.
  39. Lynch R.L., Cross K.F. (1991), Measure up!: The essential guide to measuring business performance, Mandarin.
  40. Ma J., Yang L.T., Apduhan B.O., Huang R., Barolli L., Takizawa, M. (2005), Towards a smart world and ubiquitous intelligence: A walkthrough from smart things to smart hyperspacesband UbicKids, International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications, 1, 1, pp. 53-68.
  41. Matheson, D., Matheson, J. (1998). The Smart Organization: Creating Value through Strategic R&D, Harvard Business Press.
  42. Mancini D., Corsi K., Piscitelli P. (2016), The integration of management control systems through digital platforms: a case study, in Corsi K., Castellano N., Lamboglia R., Mancini D., Reshaping accounting and management control system through digital innovation. New opportunities from business information systems, Springer Book, 9, pp. 131-151.
  43. Molefe G.N. (2010), Performance measurement dimensions for lecturers at selected universities: An international perspective, SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 8, 1.
  44. Mori K., Christodoulou A. (2012), Review of Sustainability Indices and Indicators: Towards a New City Sustainability Index (CSI), Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 32, 1, pp. 94–106.
  45. Olsen E.O., Zhou H., Lee D.M.S., Ng Y.E., Chong C.C., Padunchwit P. (2007), Performance measurement system and relationships with performance results, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56, 7, pp. 559-82.
  46. Osborne D. E., Plastrik, P. (2000), The reinventor’s fieldbook: Tools for transforming your government, San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.
  47. Owoc M., Marciniak K. (2013), Knowledge management as foundation of smart university, paper read at Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), Federated Conference.
  48. Pagliaro F., Mattoni B., Gugliermenti F., Bisegna F., Azzaro B., Tomei F., Catucci S. (2016), A roadmap toward the development of Sapienza Smart Campus, in Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC), IEEE 16th International Conference, pp. 1-6.
  49. Paolini A., Soverchia, M. (2015), La programmazione delle università italiane si rinnova: riflessioni e primi riscontri empirici, Azienda Pubblica, 3.
  50. Park T.A., Lohr L. (2007), Performance evaluation of university extension providers: a frontier approach for ordered response data, European Journal of Operational Research, 182, 2, pp. 899-910
  51. Pointing A. (2013), The political and economic implications of the smart city, Honors Thesis, Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
  52. Prahalad C.K., Ramaswamy V. (2004), Co-Creation Experiences: The Next Practice in Value Creation, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18, 3. Doi: 10.1002/dir.20015.
  53. Richter C., Kraus S., Syrjä, P. (2015), The Smart City as an opportunity for entrepreneurship, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 7, 3, pp. 211-226. Doi: 10.1504/IJEV.2015.071481.
  54. Roberts J., Armitage, J. (2006), From organization to hypermodern organization: On the accelerated appearance and disappearance of Enron, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19, 5, pp. 558-577.
  55. Roth-Berghofer T. (2014), Smart university, the university as a platform, retrieved from https://smartuniversity.uwl.ac.uk/blog/?p=100.
  56. Rusconi G. (2014), La valutazione della ricerca scientifica. Alcuni spunti di riflessione dopo le recenti esperienze in Italia, Management Control, 1, pp. 73-85. Doi: 10.3280/MACO2014-001005.
  57. Sarrico C.S., Teixeira P.N., Rosa M.J., Cardoso M.F. (2009), Subject mix and productivity in Portuguese universities, European Journal of Operational Research, 197, 1, pp. 287-95.
  58. Sauer C.S., Kheirkhahzadeh A.D., Roth-Berghofer T. (2016), Data literacy in the smart university approach, Workshop on Data Literacy for Learning Analytics at the Learning Analitics and Knowledge Conference, Edimburgo.
  59. Schafer M.A. (2009), Organizational IQ: Characteristics Common to Smart Organizations and Applicability to the U.S. Military, Master Thesis of Business Administration. The Postgraduate School. Monterey. California, retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a514252.pdf.
  60. Schmitz S., Rebelo T., Gracia F.J., and Tomás, I. (2014), Learning culture and knowledge management processes: To what extent are they effectively related?, Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30, 3, pp. 113-121.
  61. Shapiro J. (2003), Smart cities: explaining the relationship between city growth and human capital, Harvard University.
  62. Streitz N.A., Rocker C., Prante T., von Alphen D., Stenzel R., Magerkurth C. (2005), Designing smart artifacts for smart environments, Computer, 38, 3, pp. 41–49.
  63. Vveinhardt J., Minkute-Henrickson R. (2015), Transformation of a learning organization into a smart organization: expansion of human resource by intellectual capital, paper read at 15th EDULEARN Proceedings, pp. 172-181.
  64. Wang, X. (2010). Performance measurement in universities, Master Thesis, University of Twente, The Netherlands.
  65. Weisi F. U., Ping, P.E.N.G. (2014), A discussion on smart city management based on metasynthesis method, Management Science and Engineering, 8, 1, 73.
  66. Worthington, A.C., Lee, B.L. (2008), Efficiency, technology and productivity change in Australian universities, 1998–2003, Economics of education review, 27, 3, pp. 285-298. Doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2006.09.012.
  67. Zangoueinezhad A., Moshabaki A. (2011), Measuring university performance using a knowledge-based balanced scorecard, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60, 8, pp. 824-843.
  68. Zara V., Stefani E. (2017), Istituzione, attivazione e accreditamento dei Corsi di Studio, Fondazione CRUI.
  69. Zygiaris S. (2013), Smart city reference model: Assisting planners to conceptualize the building of smart city innovation ecosystems, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4, 2, pp. 217-231.